As someone who has been in the standards business since 1995, history has proven to me that:

• The business need must drive standards, standards can NEVER drive the business; and
• Trying to SELL the business on standards is a losing strategy.

Hi Congressman Reichert,

You won’t remember me, but a long time ago we were in meetings together in Seattle with the likes of John McKay, Dave Brandt, Scott Jacobs, Dale Watson, and others working on building the Law Enforcement Information Exchange (LInX); I was the technical guy on the project, working with Chief Pat Lee and our very dear lost friend Julie Fisher (may she rest-in-peace, I sure miss her).

A hell of a lot of water has gone under the bridge since then–it’s been nearly TWELVE YEARS. If we look back over this time, we have had so many bills, laws, strategies, policies, papers, speeches, conferences, proclamations, and other assorted attempts to prod law enforcement data loose from the nearly 18,000 agencies across our country. While we are far better off than we were back then, I think we can agree that we still have a long way to go.

Where we differ, I’m afraid, is in the approach to get there – a few days ago, you proposed legislation, the Department of Justice Global Advisory Committee Authorization Act of 2013, as a means to improve information sharing among law enforcement agencies - do we really believe another ”stick” will work to get agencies to share information? Do we really believe it’s a technology or data standards problem that’s preventing law enforcement data from being shared? As a technologist for 34 years, and someone who has been involved in law enforcement information sharing since the Gateway Project in St. Louis, MO in 1999, I can tell you it is neither.

While I applaud the work of the GAC, and I have many colleagues who participate in its work, I’m afraid having more meetings about information sharing, developing more standards, approving more legislation, and printing more paper will NOT help to reach the level of information sharing we all want.

Instead, I want to propose to you a solution aimed at capturing the commitment of the men and women who can actually make law enforcement information sharing happen, and virtually overnight (metaphorically speaking) – namely, the great men and women who lead our police and sheriffs departments across America.

Now to be fair, many of these agencies are already contributing their records to a system I am sure you are familiar with called the National Data Exchange (N-DEx). Built by the FBI CJIS Division, this system has matured into a pretty respectable platform for not only sharing law enforcement information, but also for helping cops and analysts to do their respective investigative and analytic work.

Now, in case you are wondering, I do not own stock in any of the companies that built N-DEx, nor has the FBI signed me up as a paid informant to market N-DEx. I write to you on my own volition as a result of my nearly six years of volunteer work as a member of the International Association of Chiefs of Police (IACP) Criminal Justice Information Systems (CJIS) Committee.

About two years ago I volunteered to lead a small sub-group of the committee who have either built, led, or managed municipal, state, federal, or regional information sharing systems. Our charge was (and still is) to help CJIS take a look under the hood of N-DEx to see what’s in there (data wise) and to help figure out what needs to be done to make it a more effective tool to help cops across America catch more criminals, and maybe, just maybe, even prevent criminals from acting in the first place.

While our work is far from done, I can tell you that one thing we need is more data – as you well know, be it N-DEx, LInX, RAIN, or any other information sharing system, it is only as good as the data that’s put into it.

Believe it or not we already have the data standards in-place to get the data into N-DEx. CJIS has developed two Information Exchange Packet Descriptions (IEPDs) that tells agencies exactly what to do and how to format and package up their data so it can get to N-DEx. Additionally, CJIS has an extensive team ready to assist and my colleagues over at the IJIS Institute hold training sessions sponsored by BJA, to help agencies along the process (NIEM training).

These two IEPDs can help law enforcement agencies today to share the following law enforcement records:

• Service Call
• Incident
• Arrest
• Missing Person
• Warrant Investigation
• Booking
• Holding
• Incarceration
• Pre-Trial Investigation
• Pre-Sent Investigation
• Supervised Release

So what’s the hold up? Speaking only for myself, and I will be very straight with you, I believe the root cause for not getting more law enforcement data into N-DEx is the current piecemeal, politically charged, hit and miss grant funding process that the Act you propose, if passed, will burden even further – see page 3, lines 17-25 and page 4, lines 1-6.

Instead, I ask that you please answer the following question…

If law enforcement information sharing is important enough to push though a Public Act, where is the nationwide project, with funding, to get all shareable law enforcement data loaded into the one system that would give ALL law enforcement officers and analysts access to collective knowledge of the nearly 18,000 law enforcement agencies?

The immediate answer might be “we already have one; N-DEx;” however, N-DEx is only a piece of the answer…it’s as they say, “one hand clapping.” And in all fairness to my friends and colleagues at the FBI CJIS Division, that program was only charged and funded to build the  N-DEx bucket, they were never funded to actually go get the data to fill the bucket.

The strategy, for whatever reason back then, was relegated to a ”build it and they will come” approach, that IMHO has not worked very well so far and may take another 5-10 years to work. I should also note that the bucket isn’t totally empty…there are quite a number of agencies and regional projects, like LInX, that have stepped up and are helping to fill the bucket – however, if we want to expedite filling up the bucket, focusing on mandating more standards is not the answer

What I submit  is the “other hand clapping” is the need for a shift focus, away from policy, standards, and technology, and establish a funded nationwide project that will offer a menu of choices and support packages to the Chiefs and Sheriffs that will enable them to start sending as many of their shareable records as possible to N-DEx.

Some of the options/support packages could include:

1. Provide direct funding to agencies and regional information sharing systems to develop N-DEx conformant data feeds to N-DEx;
2. Grant direct funding to RMS and CAD system providers to develop N-DEx conformant data feeds from their software, with the stipulation they must offer the capability at no additional cost to agencies that use their products;
3. Establish a law enforcement data mapping assistance center, either bolted on to IJIS NIEM Help Desk, as an extension of NLETS menu of services, or through funding support at an existing information sharing project like the Law Enforcement Technology, Training, & Research Center who works in partnership with the University of Central Florida.

At the end of the day, we all know that the safety and effectiveness of law enforcement is greatly affected by the information he or she has at their fingertips when responding to that call.

Do you really want to leave it to chance that that officer’s life is taken, or a criminal  or terrorist is let go because his or her agency wasn’t “lucky enough” to win the grant lottery that year?

So, let’s empower the single most powerful force that can make sure the information is available - the Sheriff or Chief leading that agency. Let’s stop with the unfunded mandates, laws, standards, studies, point papers, etc., and let’s finally put a project in-place with the funding necessary to make it happen.

v/r

Chuck Georgo,

Executive Director
NOWHERETOHIDE.ORG
chuck@nowheretohide.org

• Patricia A. Griffin, PhD, a senior consultant in Pennsylvania Mental Health and Justice Centre of Excellence;
• Bob Mann, RN, LSW, an Administrator of Mental Health Operations in the Oklahoma Department of Corrections; and
• Donna Bond, LPC, Manager of Correctional Criminal Justice and Re-Entry Services, Oklahoma Department of Mental Health and Substance Abuse Services.

Speaker #1

The webinar began with Patricia Griffin; she opened with some statistics:

• 16.9% of all jail admissions have a serious mental illness;
• Of this, 14.5% are male and 31.0% are female.

These numbers surprised me, in particular the fact that there were twice as many females with mental disorders than males. Patricia also spoke about the high rates of co-occurring substance abuse disorders and other challenges involving trauma, medical problems, and homelessness. When arrested and convicted, these people convicted face long stays in jail.

Patricia then informed us of a collaborative effort by the state of Pennsylvania (PA) to have an impact on this issue – they wanted to do something about the high number of inmates with mental issues.  It’s called The Sequential Intercept Model, a framework for understanding how people with mental illness interact with the criminal justice system.

• The term Sequential is meant to illustrate how people move through the criminal justice system in predictable ways;
• And, Intercept refers to the desire to examine the process to identify ways to intercept persons with severe mental illness.

The Westmoreland County Mental Health and Mental Retardation Program and multiple other local stakeholders requested the Pennsylvania (PA) Center of Excellence (CoE), Cross-Systems Mapping and Taking Action for Change workshops to promote progress in addressing criminal justice diversion and treatment needs of adults with mental illness in contact with the criminal justice system. They also wanted the CoE to provide additional information to help guide the implementation of newly received Day Reporting Center and Criminal Justice Liaison grants.

Mapping workshops were set up across the country to help communities address the problems; 27 counties in PA completed the workshops. The attendees were Judges, Law Enforcement, Social Services and local families whose members have been through this system. They serve as a springboard for counties to move forward and to improve their local services within their communities and to try to build better collaborative efforts.

Workshop participants got to understand what is happening at local level and begin to get a clear picture of what resources are available and how people work together. They learned from the workshops sessions that there was a clear pattern showing a lack of sobering service, detox facilities, medical assistance, and housing—this last one was a major concern for people who offend and re-offend. The workshop also found that there should be:

• More collaboration and communications;
• More training for staff; and
• Cross training between systems and expanding housing opportunities.

The workshops were a great success; participant evaluations showed that 94% of the participants would recommend the workshops to other counties.

Speaker #2

The second speaker was Bob Mann who talked about the Oklahoma Collaborative Health Program which started in 2007. This program is a collaboration of several Mental Health partners including: The Oklahoma Dept. of Corrections, The Oklahoma Dept. of Mental Health & Substance abuse, The Dept. of Human Services, The Oklahoma Health Care Authority, Social Security Administration and the Dept. of Rehabilitation Services – Disability Determination Division. The key elements contributing to the success of this program were:

• Benefit Planning – this helps people with high risk return in making sure that their benefits are in place to help them on release from prison; and
• Focus Groups – Looking at gaps causing people who return to prison.

About 50% of offenders have a history of, or are exhibiting some form of mental illness and 26% exhibit serious mental health problems. Also of note was the massive increase in people on psychotropic medication – from 1998 – 2006, there was an increase of 289%.

Speaker #3

The third speaker was Donna Bond. She explained how her inter-agency mental health re-entry program is unique in that the Oklahoma Department of Mental Health has taken ownership for the continuity of Mental Health services for offenders with the highest level of Mental Health need.

Discharge Managers (boundary spanners) receive considerable training and serve as part of the treatment team. The goal is for the individual to leave prison with Social Security benefits in place, a Medicare entitlement aligned so funding is in place for medical and mental health services following release. This process starts 120 days prior to offenders scheduled discharge.

Re-entry Intensive Care Co-ordination Teams (RICCT) meet with offenders a minimum of 90 days before the release date from prison, and they work with the offender in the community, until the offender has adjusted to life following incarceration. RICCT teams also work at helping getting the offender housed immediately on release, and also taking care of the offenders clothing and hygiene, and generally getting them a good start back into the community. Bob Mann said that 46.3% of most re-offenders return to prison within 36 months – the program has shown very good results – only 25.2% of offenders processed through the RICCT teams return.

My Thoughts

This is a subject that I am very interested in, and I’m curious why there are there more offenders today who have mental health problems, compared with thirty to forty years ago? A lot of these problems may stem from the natural percentage of the population who suffer mental illness and secondly from health problems connected to serious substance (drug) abuse.

The latter is a real and ongoing problem. From reading the stories in the newspapers we can see that drug abuse generally cause more crimes to be committed. There have been many recent news stories about crime committed by people with drug related addictions. A few examples below:

• Thomas Ashcroft, a homeless burglar in the U.K., started fires at hospitals so he could steal money to buy drugs. The fires caused a distraction so he could steal from the tills to help fund his drug addiction. He has been sentenced to eight years in prison.
• James Holmes the gunman who massacred 12 people in a cinema in Aurora, Colorado, was hooked on prescription painkillers. He started out life as a bright, quite brilliant young boy.
• In Sundays Irish Times, Jan 27th 2012, a story showed that Crime Figures for the Republic show a sharp rise in the number of sexual offences, kidnappings and drug related crimes between 2006 and 2010, according to Central Statistics Office figures recently published. Sadly, drugs are available everywhere in Ireland; young people have easy access to them, there is never a problem buying them or knowing where to find them.

It also seems like mental health problems are on the increase. We only have to open our newspapers each day to see tragic stories of people who have taken their own life, or have killed loved ones and themselves. Some were probably receiving treatment from mental health services, and then may have stopped attending clinics or they ran out of money to pay for treatment. We need to come up with better ways to take care of people with mental health problems. Not to “control” them, but to ensure they are getting appropriate treatment and to make sure they are taking their medicine.

People with mental health illnesses need care and attention, and people in their family and local community should be aware of their problem and “look out” for them. If they should need help, families and people in the community should know who to contact if they feel something is not quite right.

The Oklahoma program is a good example of this, and the statistics show that this is a successful approach. The hard work of people like Patricia Griffin, Bob Mann and Donna Bond is crucial in the success of such program. They are committed and passionate about their work in helping to re-habilitate people, to keep them from a life of crime, and help them to adjust to a happier life without re-offending. It’s important for everyone to become more aware and supportive of community efforts like this, and to help, where we can.

until next time…Is fhearr fheuchainn na bhith san duil

Mary

• Katie Sepich Enhanced DNA Collection Act of 2012 authorizes grants to offset states’ costs for testing the DNA of arrestees. The new law does not require states to collect DNA from arrestees, and participation in the grant program would be voluntary.
• Synthetic Drug Abuse Prevention Act of 2012 bans the use of synthetic marijuana, known as “K-2” or “Spice,” and other synthetic drugs, such as bath salts. The bill adds the cannabimimetic agents and several hallucinogenic substances to Schedule 1 of the Controlled Substances Act. The law also extends the period for which the Attorney General may temporarily schedule a substance to two years with a one-year extension. Previously, a substance could only be put temporarily on the Schedule I list for one year with a six-month extension. The bill passed as an amendment to the Food and Drug Administration Safety and Innovation Act.
• SAFE DOSES Act increases the federal penalties for the theft of drugs, medical devices and infant formula before the products reach store shelves. The goal is to target criminal organizations that steal sensitive goods for resale in the wholesale drug market. Under the new law, the maximum sentence is 20 years, or up to 30 years if the offense resulted in serious bodily injury or death.
• Residential Appointment Efficiency and Streamlining Act of 2011changed the way about 10 percent of all presidential appointments are handled, thereby reducing the burden on the Senate and the time spent getting new appointees approved. Under the new law, the President will appoint, but the Senate will no longer need to confirm, the directors of the Bureau of Justice Assistance (BJA), Bureau of Justice Statistics, (BJS), National Institute of Justice (NIJ), Office of Victims of Crime (OVC) and the Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention (OJJDP).
• Resolving a long-standing priority of the emergency management and law enforcement community, Congress passed a bill allocating to public safety the D Block section of the nation’s telecommunications spectrum. In addition to designating the D Block for public safety, the bill set aside $7 billion for the build out of a nationwide public safety broadband network and provides for the governance of the spectrum and for the preservation of the 700 MHz narrowband voice spectrum.
• Child Protection Act of 2012 increases the maximum penalties from 10 to 20 years for child pornography offenses that involve prepubescent children or children under the age of 12. The new law allows a federal court to issue a protective order if it determines that a child victim or witness is being harassed or intimidated and imposes criminal penalties for violation of a protective order. The Act also reauthorizes for five years the Internet Crimes Against Children (ICAC) Task Forces, a national network of investigators who have arrested more than 30,000 individuals involved in child exploitation since 1998.
• Investigative Assistance for Violent Crimes Act of 2012 authorizes the Attorney General or Secretary of Homeland Security, at the request of a state or local government, to assist in the investigation of violent acts and shootings occurring at schools, colleges, universities, nonfederal office buildings, malls, and other public places, and in the investigation of mass killings and attempted mass killings. The new law defines “mass killings” as three or more killings in a single incident.

• Bradley Manning, US Army soldier who released 750,000 documents to wikileaks
• Jacob Tyler Roberts, another young man who shot up an Oregon mall
• Adam Lanza, young man who killed 26 at a Newtown, CT school
• Marijana Bego, NYC art gallery owner who jumped to her death yesterday

The answer? One or more people knew something was wrong BEFOREHAND.

I am now convinced that EVERY incident, whether it is a tragic shooting, a terrorist act, espionage, or a sole suicide, there were signs ahead of time that something was not quite right with the individual(s) involved.

So what can we do? We have to take better care of each other. When we see signs that someone isn’t quite the way they used to be, call them on it. Ask questions. Take action BEFORE something bad happens.

Scared that you’ll embarrass them? scared you’ll embarrass yourself? If so, just think how you will feel if you don’t take action and something even worse happens…how will you feel then?

• In Bradley’s case, the Army knew there were reasons NOT to put him in a position of trust, and they did anyway!
• In Jacob’s case, his own roommate said he acted weird and talked about moving and selling his possessions!
• In Adam’s case, the school district security officer knew he had disabilities!
• And, in Marijana’s case, many people around her knew she was erratic and not happy.

I would hate to be in any of those person’s shoes…

so, for 2013, let’s try and take better care of each other, and vow to intervene early, maybe we can save a life.

Merry Christmas and Happy New Year

r/Chuck

While most of the world is focusing on “technology” as a solution to preventing insider threat attacks to organization/agency information and systems, hardly anyone is focused on leadership’s responsibility to create and sustain a work environment that minimizes the chance for an employee to turn into an insider threat.

On October 21, 2012, I had the chance to speak on this issue at the 2012 International Cyber Threat Task Force (ICTTF) Cyber Threat Summit in Dublin, Ireland a few weeks ago; here is a video recording of my presentation, I hope you find it informative and useful.

r/Chuck

I saw on the NATO Allied Command Operations (ACO) Website Link of the Day that you are attending a the Counter Piracy Working Group today in London, England. I thought I would share a piece of work that I out together a while back that suggests a menu of activities (a 360 degree approach) for reducing piracy at sea. The activities in the diagram below point to initiatives that can be launched in a number of political, military, economic, social, infrastructure, and information infrastructure (PMESII) categories, ashore and at-sea. I hope they can help guide some of the discussion at your meeting today.

v/r

Chuck Georgo

Deputy Skinner opened up the presentation to tell us that quite a few years ago, Baltimore was America’s Murder capital. In 1995, there was an estimated 1 homicide per day in Baltimore. By 2011 this was down to 197 in a year. Since 2007 they have achieved a 35% reduction in non-fatal shootings and juvenile homicides have decreased since 2008. By using technology, Baltimore Police have achieved historical lows in violent crime, whilst reducing budgets they have redirected the resources they have at the Police Department.

Gayle Guilford, Systems Director for Baltimore PD explained the Side Partner Project. This initiative came out in 2009. The aim was to ‘get Police out of their cars and back into the community’. Gayle spoke about years ago, when Officers would ‘walk the beat’, and be an integral part of the community. They knew people by name, and would walk around the neighborhoods, speaking to people and generally being involved in the daily life around them. This was comforting for people, and they trusted their Police.

Since taking police of the streets and into patrol cars, citizens have become distanced from the police and possibly lost the trust that was once had. To combat this and to get the Police back onto the streets, Blackberry phones with a “Pocket Cop” application were handed out to the Officers. With the phone in their hand, they can carry out checks on warrants, driving records and photographs. It also tells them who they should be looking out for, and what their daily priorities are.

The system also allows Officers to start taking evidence such as photos and streaming video before the forensic teams arrive. This is very useful in domestic violence situations. They can immediately upload evidence and get information out to other officers who can assist if they are nearby, if they have to look for a suspect, they will have a photograph to help them.

The application is also wired up to GPS and Google maps. This can tell Police dispatchers where officers are located and their availability to respond to a situation. Gayle hopes that future budgets will allow that every Police Officer will have a blackberry in the next few years.

Next to speak was Lt. Hood, Director of Law Enforcement Operation for CitiWatch in Baltimore PD. Lt. Hood is one of those types of people that are immediately likeable, and when he began his presentation on CCTV, I was enthralled.

The CitiWatch program is one of America’s most sophisticated surveillance networks in operation. It started off with 50 cameras and now has over 500 across Baltimore City. The cameras are monitored by the Criminal Intelligence Watch Center inside the Baltimore PD, 24 hours a day, 7 days a week by specially trained CCTV operators, mainly retired Police Officers.

Extra staff are used at weekends to monitor the busiest times, especially at night. Lt Hood likes using retired Police as they have the knowledge and are also trained on a variety of subjects including radio communications and uniform crime reporting.

CitiWatch cameras records footage, which is stored for 28 days and then archived off site. Video footage is crucial in identifying suspects and capturing evidence in many crimes. Lt Hood then proceeded to show us some footage, in which the Police were able to make subsequent arrests and help also to prevent certain criminal acts.

In many instances where a crime was being committed, it was monitored by staff, and Police were alerted to see who was the nearest to where the crime was taking place. They could then go to the scene and take control of the situation.

Many would feel that we have reached the ‘Big Brother is watching you’ stage considering how many cities around the world are using camera technology, but in reality those cameras are not there to spy on the public, but instead are there to help us and keep us safe by watching out for the bad guys.

Lt. Hood and his team proved this. I spend a lot of time in Baltimore, and I am happy that Lt. Hood is watching out for us, and I for one walked away from that presentation feeling a little bit safer.

For more information and to find out more about Baltimore Police check out:

www.baltimorepolice.org

Till next time…

r/Mary

Boy was I off the mark. I attended a presentation by Michele Stuart, an Investigator with her own company, JAG Investigations, Inc in Arizona. From the moment she started her presentation, we were on the edge of our seats. For about 40 minutes, she made us all sit up and listen to what she had to tell us about the challenges and tools of using the internet to conduct investigations and to share with us her impressive knowledge of public records and on-line databases.

With over 18 years of investigative experience behind her, Michele knew a lot about websites that rob your personal information, how to find someone on the internet, and many more informative pieces of information that would help those who use the internet to find people.

As an example, she launched her presentation with “who owns an android phone”, as several of us raised our hands. Followed with “and do you have the flashlight app installed on your androids”? To which several of us (including me!) left our hands up. Apparently by downloading flashlight, and by agreeing to the terms and conditions, we are allowing this little app to secretly take video (and audio), see what numbers we are calling, and many other things you wouldn’t normally think a flashlight app should do. I suddenly felt my phone was ‘dirty’ and I uninstalled flashlight there and then – for more information, take a look here - http://itunes.apple.com/gb/app/flashlight./id285281827

Michele also warned us of websites that can do harm to our personal information, and websites that will create fake identities like your virtual buddy, which you can set to ring you and possibly get you away from where you don’t want to be by pretending it’s your friend calling and wants to meet you urgently. A great excuse when you do need to leave without appearing rude. She also told us the best sites to find old addresses, and how to find people you have lost touch with.

Of all the sessions I attended at LEIM, Michele’s was the most entertaining. Her quick fire delivery, rarely pausing for breath, as she just wanted to tell us all she could in her allotted time slot. And tell us she did with much passion and plenty of humor, it was pure entertraining (entertaining training). I will certainly keep her business card handy; I may need her help one day.

Some websites Michele mentioned:

www.jaginvestigations.com – Michele’s Company

http://alibinetwork.com – creates fake identifications

http://www.networksolutions.com/ – here you can find old addresses and email addresses by searching domain names.

r/Mary

Through use of mobile technologies like smart phones, paper in law enforcement interactions is disappearing. No more filling out lengthy forms. Instead information is loaded from a mobile device directly into a database to be saved and shared and used when needed. Most young people today who join police departments, are technology savvy and actually expect new technologies to be in place.

Use of social media is another innovative way Police are using modern technology. Through social media, police are engaging their communities in information sharing and use the information to develop more effective predictive policing strategies by becoming more aware of criminal activity and hot spots around town.

When I returned to Dublin (Ireland not Ohio) after the LEIM conference, I was delighted to find a story in Ireland’s Daily Mail on Monday 28th May. It was titled – Facebook’s Crime Fight, and it explained how communities, particularly in rural areas of Ireland, are combating the closure of Garda (police) stations by turning to Facebook to help fight crime.

Residents are using the site to monitor suspicious activity while text alerts are also sent out to warn locals about any possible criminal behavior. One particular group in County Meath, launched their Facebook site last year and have said that they feel safer in their homes, and it is helping to solve crimes.

The community and the local Gardai (police service), work together. The Gardai contact the webpage’s administrators about suspicious behavior, and then a warning is posted onto Facebook, to notify the community residents. The text alerts are proving to be very successful to notify Gardai of potential criminal activity and to warn members of the community if there is someone suspicious in the area. Everyone in the area now feels safer, and the community has become vigilant in helping to protect their homes.

Expanded use of social media started because of the cut-backs in the Policing sector—as many as 39 Garda stations will be closed across Ireland by the end of June 2012, and more than 40 stations to be closed in the next round.

Facebook has proven to be successful tool to help communities and police communicate and work together to fight crime by gathering information and sharing it. If using social media helps to make people feel safer and gives them more control over crime in their communities, then this is sure to become the future of fighting crime.

It no longer makes sense to sit back and watch crime happening, or expect that the police alone will take care of crime in our communities—as Sir Robert Peel, is often quoted “the police are the community and the community are the police” – social media gives citizens a powerful tool to work together to prevent crime in their neighborhoods. This will also help to strengthen the relationship between police and the public, and that can only be a good thing.

For more information on on how Social Media is used in Public Safety, check out the International Association of Chiefs of Police website below, and under Topics of Interest, click on Social Media, and it will take you to all the information you need about Social Media used in Law Enforcement, including blog posts, news items of interest from around the country, and a new survey showing the results of the current state of practice of Social Media within the Law Enforcement Community.

http://www.iacpsocialmedia.org/

More posts from LEIM coming soon…r/Mary