<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>NOWHERETOHIDE.ORG &#187; Evaluation</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.nowheretohide.org/tag/evaluation/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.nowheretohide.org</link>
	<description>NOWHERETOHIDE.ORG Website</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 16 Dec 2011 14:04:27 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
		<item>
		<title>What Gets Measured Gets Done&#8230;Using Evaluation to Drive Law Enforcmement Information Sharing</title>
		<link>http://www.nowheretohide.org/2009/01/02/what-gets-measured-gets-doneusing-evaluation-to-drive-law-enforcmement-information-sharing/</link>
		<comments>http://www.nowheretohide.org/2009/01/02/what-gets-measured-gets-doneusing-evaluation-to-drive-law-enforcmement-information-sharing/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Jan 2009 05:03:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>chuckgeorgo</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[CJIS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[data sharing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Evaluation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Information sharing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[law enforcement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Law enforcement information sharing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[LEIS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Performance Measures]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Processes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[public safety]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SOA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Strategy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[business process]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[standards]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nowheretohide.org/wordpress/?p=49</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[What gets measured gets done--let's use evaluation to drive implementation of law enforcement informaitonshairng (LEIS). Here are six standards to get us going.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a title="What gets Measured Gets Done, Tom Peters, 1986" href="http://www.tompeters.com/col_entries.php?note=005143&amp;year=1986" target="_blank">Tom Peters </a>liked to say &#8220;<strong>what gets measured gets done</strong>.&#8221;  The Office of Management and Budget (OMB) took this advice to heart when they started the federal Performance Assessment Rating Tool (PART) (<a href="http://www.whitehouse.gov/omb/part/">http://www.whitehouse.gov/omb/part/</a>) to assess and improve federal program performance so that the Federal government can achieve better results. PART includes a set of criteria in the form of questions that helps an evaluator to identify a program’s strengths and weaknesses to inform funding and management decisions aimed at making the program more effective.</p>
<p>I think we can take a lesson from Tom and the OMB and begin using a formal framework for evaluating the <span style="text-decoration: underline;">level of implementation</span> and <span style="text-decoration: underline;">real-world results</span> of the many <strong>Law Enforcement Information Sharing</strong> projects around the nation.  Not for any punitive purposes, but as a proactive way to ensure that the energy, resources, and political will continues long enough to see these projects achieve what their architects originally envisioned. </p>
<p>I would like to propose that the evaluation framework be based on six &#8220;<strong>Standards for Law Enforcement Information Sharing</strong>&#8221; that every LEIS project should strive to comply with; they include:</p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;">1. <span style="text-decoration: underline;">Active Executive Engagement</span> in LEIS Governance and Decision-Making;</p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;">2. <span style="text-decoration: underline;">Robust Privacy and Security</span> Policy and Active Compliance Oversight;</p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;">3. <span style="text-decoration: underline;">Public Safety Priorities Drive Utilization</span> Through Full Integration into Daily Operations;</p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;">4. Access and Fusion of the <span style="text-decoration: underline;">Full Breadth and Depth of Regional Data</span> (law enforcement related);</p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;">5. <span style="text-decoration: underline;">Wide Range of Technical Capabilities</span> to Support Public Safety Business Processes; and</p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;">6. <span style="text-decoration: underline;">Stable Base of Sustainment Funding</span> for Operational and Technical Infrastructure Support.</p>
<p>My next step is to develop scoring criteria for each of these standards; three to five per standard, something simple and easy for project managers and stakeholders to use as a tool to help get LEIS &#8220;done.&#8221;</p>
<p>I would like to what you think of these standards and if you would like to help me develop the evaluation tool itself&#8230;r/Chuck</p>
<p><strong>Chuck Georgo</strong><br />
<a href="mailto:chuck@nowheretohide.org">chuck@nowheretohide.org</a><br />
<a href="http://www.nowheretohide.org">www.nowheretohide.org</a> </p>
<p style="margin-top: 0pt; margin-bottom: 0pt; margin-left: 0.38in; text-indent: -0.38in; language: en-US; mso-line-break-override: none; punctuation-wrap: hanging;"> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.nowheretohide.org/2009/01/02/what-gets-measured-gets-doneusing-evaluation-to-drive-law-enforcmement-information-sharing/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

